Loxo alternative

The agentic ATS alternative to Loxo, without the AI paywall

Loxo pairs a modern ATS with a large built-in sourcing database, strongest for US-based executive search and perm desks willing to pay for its Professional tier to unlock AI search and matching. Globus.ai is a full agentic ATS too, built around an orchestrated team of named AI colleagues included from day one, with temp, shift and healthcare compliance workflows at its core, not a plan upgrade away.

Book a demo See the full comparison

What staffing agencies measured with Globus.ai

+377% Recruiter productivity OnePartnerGroup
+205% Request volume handled OnePartnerGroup
85% Requests created by the customer, not the recruiter OnePartnerGroup self-service
Globus.ai vs Loxo

Where the two platforms actually differ

Loxo is a genuinely strong "talent intelligence" platform for US-based executive search and perm agencies, and its built-in sourcing database is a real differentiator worth naming plainly, not something Globus.ai claims to match feature-for-feature. The rest of the difference is architectural and geographic: Loxo's AI search, matching and outreach are reserved for its custom-quoted Professional tier, and its data is reported strongest inside the US; Globus.ai ships its full agent team from day one and is built first for temp, shift, healthcare and Nordic/UK staffing compliance.

Feature Globus.ai Loxo
AI architecture An orchestrated team of specialist agents, each owning a job end to end, included from day one AI search, matching and outreach automation reserved for the custom-quoted Professional tier
Order intake from client email, PDF, portals Automatic, any format, under a minute Not a stated focus – built around candidate sourcing and CRM workflow
Temp, shift and assignment filling Core: priority-based routing with SLA, availability confirmation, quick booking Built for permanent placement and executive search desks
Healthcare and staffing compliance Continuous credential and expiry monitoring with audit trail Not a stated focus
Candidate sourcing database Search & Match reasons over your own record and history, with a written explanation Loxo Source: a large built-in contact database, a genuine strength for US outbound sourcing
International data coverage Nordic and UK staffing practice, local-language desks Reported strongest in North America; contact and profile data described in reviews as less consistent outside the US
Client-facing presentation No-login client portal, with AI qualifying and filling behind it Client portal available; white-labeling reported as limited in reviews
Explainability and human-in-the-loop Control Room: every automated decision explained, reviewable, auditable, built for the EU AI Act Not documented publicly
Pricing model Usage-based Globus Credits: cost follows volume, not per-seat headcount Listed from around $169/user/month (Basic), with AI reserved for a custom-quoted Professional plan reported in the $250-400+/user/month range

A team, included from day one

Named colleagues, no plan upgrade required

Where Loxo's AI search and matching sit behind its Professional tier, every Globus.ai agent is part of the platform from the first day.

  • Eira
    Eira Inbox Intelligence

    Reads the orders, whatever format they arrive in, and structures them in under a minute.

  • Saga
    Saga Search & Match

    Builds the shortlist and explains it, learning from every acceptance and rejection.

  • Odin
    Odin Strategic Sourcing

    Builds long-term talent pools and strategic sourcing pipelines, the same job a sourcing database supports, done as ongoing work rather than a static list.

  • Freja
    Freja Autopilot

    Routes and confirms shift and assignment offers automatically, with SLA built in.

Built for enterprise and healthcare staffing

  • EU hosting and GDPR
  • EU AI Act ready
  • Human-in-the-loop by design
  • Randstad, Dedicare, OnePartnerGroup
Getting started

A guided move, built for staffing workflows

  1. 01

    Migrate or connect

    Your data is mapped and moved by us as a full agentic-ATS migration, or Globus.ai runs alongside Loxo first, whichever fits your desk.

  2. 02

    Calibrate

    Your roles, clients, compliance rules and preferences, built for temp, shift and healthcare desks from day one.

  3. 03

    One agent at a time

    Start where the hours go. No cutover date forced, no sunset date forced.

“Globus.ai works. We reach more candidates, do less work, and we book more doctors. Sweden was a tragedy. Now it is exactly the opposite, Sweden is our largest market.”

Thom-Erik Gruer CEO, Helsebemanning

Loxo alternative, common questions

Is Loxo a good product?

Yes. It is a genuinely capable, well-built platform, and Loxo Source, its built-in sourcing database, is a real asset for outbound-heavy desks. It is particularly strong for US-based executive search and perm agencies that want to consolidate their tool stack into one workspace.

So when should we choose Loxo over Globus.ai?

When your desk is US-based, genuinely perm or executive-search led, and you want a large built-in contact database as the centrepiece of how you source, and you are comfortable paying for the Professional tier to unlock AI search and matching. Choose Globus.ai when you run temp, shift or healthcare desks, when Nordic or UK market coverage and staffing-specific compliance matter, or when you want the full agent team included rather than gated behind a plan upgrade.

Do both options require a migration?

Choosing either Loxo or Globus.ai as your system of record involves moving your data, yes. Globus.ai's migration is handled for you and calibrated to staffing, temp and healthcare workflows from the first day; a phased, coexistence-first transition is also available if you would rather run it alongside your current system before cutting over.

What is the real difference between a sourcing database and an orchestrated agent team?

A sourcing database is a place to search for contacts. An orchestrated agent team goes further: named agents each own a job end to end, from reading an order through shortlisting, engaging candidates and confirming a booking, coordinating with each other rather than waiting on a recruiter to run the next search.

How does the pricing compare?

Loxo is reported to list its Basic plan from around $169/user/month, with AI search and matching reserved for a custom-quoted Professional tier, commonly reported in the $250-400+/user/month range. Globus.ai is usage-based through Globus Credits, so cost follows the volume of work the agents do rather than the number of seats. Ask us to model it against your actual order volumes.

Do you have European data residency?

Yes. Data is processed in the EU, with GDPR compliance, human-in-the-loop review and an audit trail on every automated decision, built for Nordic and UK staffing desks specifically rather than adapted from a US-first product.

See it on your own orders

Meet the agentic ATS built for staffing

Thirty minutes, your real orders. See what a full agent team looks like without a Professional-tier upgrade to unlock it.

Explore more

Related comparisons